Presidential Elections Petitions Tribunal in Abuja will today hold an inaugural sitting on the petitions filed by candidates of five political parties challenging the February 25 presidential election.
Officials at the Court of Appeal headquarters in Abuja had last week announced that the inaugural session by the president of the court, Monica Dongban-Mensem, will form part of the pre-hearing session of the court.
The pre-hearing session features issues such as amendment of writs, and motions, correction of typos, aligning of main issues in the petitions and outlining the hearing modalities and procedures.
Barring any last-minute change, the tribunal panel will comprise Haruna Tsammani, Stephen Adah, B.M. Ugo, Bolaji Yusuf and A.B. Muhammed.
Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar; Labour Party (LP) and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi; Action Alliance (AA)’s Solomon Okangbuan; Action Peoples Party (APP)’s Nnamdi Osita and the Allied Peoples Movement (APM)’s Chichi Ojei are those with petitions challenging the declaration of the APC’s Bola Tinubu as winner of the election.
Under Section 239 of the Nigerian Constitution, 1999, the Court of Appeal has been conferred with the original jurisdiction to determine questions as to the validity of the election of the president and vice president.
Section 132(8) of the Electoral Act, 2022, says the tribunal, which was activated in March with the approval of orders for the inspection of election materials by Atiku and Obi, will conclude the sitting within 180 days, while any further appeal will take 60 days.
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared Tinubu the winner of the elections with 8,794,726 votes, Atiku second with 6,984,520 votes, and Obi third with 6,101,533 votes.
Atiku demands live transmission
Presidential candidate of the PDP, Atiku Abubakar, has asked the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja to grant access to the live transmission of the proceedings.
Atiku and the PDP brought the application on May 5 seeking “An order directing the court’s registry and the parties on modalities for admission of media practitioners and their equipment into the courtroom.”
The application filed on their behalf by their legal team led by Chris Uche is predicated among other grounds that the disputed election is of national and public interest, especially voters in the 36 states and the FCT.
The application is coming at a time various organisations and prominent citizens are making similar calls for live broadcasts of the tribunal proceedings.
Among those making the call is from the President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Yakubu Maikyau, at the NBA’s National Executive Committee meeting in Birnin Kebbi on March 23, and the Project Nigeria Movement (PNM).
PDP, APC trade words over plot to compromise judges
Meanwhile, PDP and the ruling APC have traded tackles over alleged plots to compromise tribunal judges.
Addressing a press conference yesterday in Abuja Debo Ologunagba, the national publicity secretary of the PDP alleged there were “shocking revelations, reports and allegations of plots by the APC to influence the outcome of the presidential election petition currently before the tribunal.
“The alleged planned onslaught by APC leaders on eminent Nigerians and our democratic institutions, including the judiciary, stems from APC’s apprehensions given the weight of evidence against it as well as the continuing refusal by the majority of Nigerians to accept the outcome of the flawed presidential election,” Ologunaba said.
But in a swift reaction, chief spokesman of the APC Presidential Campaign Council for the March 25 poll, Festus Keyamo, described the allegations as cheap blackmail.
Keyamo said, “The allegations are infantile, lacking in substance and devoid of proof. Nigerians should dismiss them with a wave of the hand, please.
“PDP and its sister company, the LP have been the ones sponsoring surrogates to ‘speak out’ against the outcome of the largely free and fair 2023 presidential election when their cases are still pending in court. That is contempt of court and we are within our rights to correct the wrong impressions about the elections being created before Nigerians and the international community.”
In a related development, there have been requests for the transfer of governorship election petition tribunals of Ebonyi, Enugu, Rivers and Taraba states to Abuja.
Although the request by the PDP for the transfer of Ebonyi’s tribunal was approved over security concerns, other political parties are still challenging it.
