Viewpoint
![[OPINION]: Between Ambode and Lagos landlords -Segun Adeniyi](/media/k2/items/cache/56fdb842f2458bf675da9c35c277e43a_L.jpg)
Following public outcry over provisions of the 2018 Land Use Charge (LUC) in Lagos State, Governor Akinwunmi Ambode last week announced a downward review of the charges. While it is good that the government would respond to public opinion and make concessions, there are also those who argue that the state needs to address several other concerns which may necessitate repealing the law in its entirety. Incidentally, I foresaw this problem about 17 years ago but it would appear that the current administration in the state has refused to learn any lessons from the past.
In December 2001 when the law was first promulgated, my column on this page was titled “Tinubu Can’t Be Serious”. Then, like now, it was as if the people don’t matter, even though Governor Bola Tinubu eventually had to listen to voices of reason before reaching a compromise with critical stakeholders. I am reproducing that particular piece to remind Ambode of how the problem started, before I draw my conclusion.
===============================================================
About four weeks ago, three Lagos State Commissioners (Rauf Aregbesola, Oladele Alake and Olawale Edun) visited our Apapa office and they wasted no time before telling us their mission. First, the Information and Strategy Commissioner, Alake, went into a laborious explanation on how Lagos has become a mega city and the problems associated with over population. He was supported by his Works counterpart, Aregbesola before Edun, the Finance Commissioner, brought in one ‘Oyinbo’ consultant to give us a lecture with a projector.
Since none of the editors owns any property in Lagos, the visiting commissioners knew we would not be much problem. Even at that, many of us were actually receptive to the idea because members of the elite in Nigeria do not like paying taxes. So if the property owner class would be taxed to develop the state, it was not a bad move. The snag though is that in enacting such a law, the people should be adequately informed while the levies should be reasonable. Unfortunately, that is not what has transpired on this matter.
In a letter dated 10th September 2001, addressed to many landlords in Victoria Island, outrageous amounts of money were charged. A copy of one of such letters sent to a property owner on Oyin Jolayemi Street (who shared it with me in confidence) reads: “Notice is hereby given in respect of the land and buildings situated at the following location… The land and buildings have been assessed in accordance with the Land Use Charges Law, 2001 and have been found to have an assessed value as noted below: N180, 981, 000. 00. The Land and buildings are being used for commercial purposes and are therefore subject to Land Use Charges of 2.50% of the assessed value. The following Land Use Charges are payable: Land Use Charges set for the year 2001—N4, 524, 525.00.”
As if the letter was written by one of those lawyers who worked under the late General Sani Abacha, it continued: “The Lagos State Land Use Charges Law, 2001 provides for penalties for delayed payment and these are fully enforceable (and will be enforced) under the law. The amount, including the penalties which will be payable in the event of payment delayed after the 15-day grace period following the due date above, is as follows: For payment between Oct. 25, 2001 and Nov. 9, 2001—N5, 655, 656. 25; For payment made between Nov. 10, 2001 and Dec 2001—N6, 786, 787.50; For payment made between Dec 10, 2001 and Jan. 8, 2002—N9, 049, 050.00.”
Now the clincher: “If payment in accordance with the foregoing is not received on or before Jan., 8, 2002, the property to which this notice relates shall be liable to receivership by the State or its appointed agent until all outstanding taxes, payments, penalties and administrative charges are paid under the law.”
While I commend Tinubu’s efforts in developing Lagos and one cannot fault his revenue generation drive, his latest decision makes no sense and he cannot win the support of the people on a patently flawed process. One, a ‘law’ that was just passed is now given retroactive powers as if we are under military regime. Two, even if a property is worth N181 million must a landlord pay N4.5 million in a year as charges when the rent on the property might just be only slightly above that? Three, is it sensible to base an annual assessment for the purpose of administering charges on the value rather than on the rent accruable on a property? Four, do the property owners not deserve to be consulted before this arbitrary law was enacted?
Even as a lay man in economic matters, I am fully aware that one of the cardinal principles of taxation is that it must be reasonable. Why is it that the authorities in Lagos want residents to pay some ridiculous annual charges that would further hike the already high rent on property in the state? Besides, when the Lagos State Government started this property assessment campaign, what they told us at the time was that it would only be for planning and not for taxes; does it mean they were deceiving the people?
It would appear that a common feature of governance in Lagos now is arbitrary regime of levies—from the council to the state. But Edun and his men in the Lagos State Finance Ministry had better put on their thinking caps and come up with a more realistic formula on their new ‘law’ otherwise Lagos property owners might be compelled to simply ignore them. Then we will see how many houses they will put under receivership in a democratic government. Even Abacha, as brutal as he was, would find it impossible implementing the ‘law’ Tinubu now wants to foist on Lagos property owners…
ENDNOTE:
The foregoing, as I said, was written 17 years ago and it is unfortunate that Ambode would follow the same old route of ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ that engendered a serious friction in the past. Besides, feigning ignorance on the fact that these same charges have been reviewed three times since 2001, as prescribed in the law, is, to put it mildly, rather shameful. If the governor had consulted widely, as he ought to, especially on a sensitive issue such as this, he would not run into the kind of problem he has now found himself.
In many ways, there is an underlying subterfuge and insincerity in the repeated use of ‘law’ to legitimize extortion as taxation in many states across the country today and Lagos is becoming the most notorious in this regard. Yet, hiding under law to foist on the people unpopular policies is counter-productive. In history, some of the greatest outrages against humanity have been committed under ‘laws’ passed by manipulated parliaments. But history is also replete with empires that crumbled under the weight of their own contradictions.
While I remain an admirer of the Lagos model of political succession that has engendered a measure of incremental development and I endorse taxation as a public policy, I am also aware that the arrogance of power that made the defunct National Republic Convention (NRC) to defeat the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the dramatic 4th December 1991 gubernatorial election in Lagos State may not be too far away, if care is not taken. The glaring abuse of the legislative process (with names of private companies even being written into laws) in a revenue-generating gambit that fails to take into account the prevailing economic situation in the country can only lead to one inevitable conclusion: Hubris!
Of Police and Dapchi
In what has become a familiar trick, the Inspector-General of Police, Mr Ibrahim Idris, on Monday ordered the withdrawal of all his officers and men attached to private individuals and companies. Not surprisingly, the directive was received with derision by most Nigerians who remembered that practically all his predecessors made similar pronouncement to no effect. Sadly, that in itself speaks to the rot in the police, a law enforcement institution that cannot enforce its own order!
While some ‘Nollywood Senators’ would want to retain their undue privileges, I subscribe to the idea that, in the light of the frequent invasion, by Boko Haram, of schools in the North-east to carry away female students, those policemen should be deployed to provide security. But my main concern is that Nigerian VIPs would not release the police personnel serving them, most of who have become embedded in their politics and businesses, while IGP Idris who is huffing and puffing in the media will do nothing.
It is noteworthy that on 21 August 2015, it was announced that President Muhammadu Buhari had directed the then Inspector General of Police, Mr Sunday Arase to withdraw the over 130, 000 police personnel attached to unauthorized persons and VIPs in the country so they could be deployed to confront the serious security challenges afflicting the nation. Four days later, Chairman of the Police Service Commission (PSC), Sir Mike Okiro, (himself a retired IGP) said a team had been constituted to enforce the presidential directive. “The monitoring team will have the powers to stop VIPs on the highways, airports etc, for confirmation of their status and that of the policemen attached to them” said Okiro who warned that “any erring VIP or policeman caught in such unauthorized beat, will be prosecuted”. He also said most memorably, “We cannot afford to have more than half of the population of the police in private hands.”
Three years down the line, Okiro is still singing from the same hymn book as he again lamented last month: “We cannot afford to have more than half of the population of the police in private hands”. Even a parrot cannot do better, although Okiro also explained by way of excuse: “We could not sustain the enforcement of the order on the withdrawal of policemen attached to unqualified persons in the country because of lack of fund.”
At an interactive session with Police Inspectors and other rank and file personnel selected from commands nationwide at the Force Headquarters in Abuja on 21 May 2015, then IGP, Solomon Arase spoke to the abuse of police personnel by the VIPs to which many of them are attached. “Those of you who are posted to VIPs, on no account should you carry their bags and on no account should you act as domestic servants to them. Your uniform must be respected. Anybody who wants to hire a domestic help should not use our policemen who are sent to protect them as domestic help” Arase warned but the misconduct continues without anybody ever brought to book.
In the light of the current precarious security situation in the country, it is no longer tenable that our policemen are only good at carrying handbags for spouses and concubines of ‘Big Men’ while our children are left at the mercy of sundry criminal cartels on their school campuses. Therefore, Idris must understand that it is not only his credibility that is on the line but also that of the president whose name he is invoking on the latest directive. To borrow the words of Okiro, “we cannot afford to have more than half the population of the police in private hands.”
The Amber Light is On…2
That brinksmanship is the name of the game in Nigeria today can be glimpsed from the giant billboards that now dot strategic places in Abuja with banner headlines: ‘Red Alert’. For those who pay attention, the message, targeted at the National Assembly by one Aminu Balel Kurfi (Dan Arewa), proclaims: “Frustrating the President will no longer be tolerated by the masses.”
Although the main concern of the Dan Arewa do-gooder is the delay in the passage of the 2018 budget, the underlying tension between the lawmakers and the presidency over the order of election and the orgy of killings which many politicians, across ethnic and religious divides, are capitalising upon, compound the situation as we inch gradually to another crucial general election. When you add into the mix a growing capacity of Boko Haram to cart away (and later return some) innocent school girls almost unchallenged, you get the picture of a nation under siege.
Meanwhile, as I said, squabbles over the Electoral Act are nothing new, only that we have never witnessed this sort of desperation and long-drawn power struggle. For instance, on 6th December 2001, then President Olusegun Obasanjo wrote the National Assembly, declining assent to the Electoral Bill sent to him the previous day because “…for the stability of the polity and the survival of our nascent democracy, it is imperative that only serious and creditable political parties should be allowed to participate in general elections…”
Following my intervention on this page at that period, I got a mail from Mr Sam Omatseye, the current Chairman of the editorial board of The Nation newspaper who was then a university lecturer in the United States. Reading Omatseye’s mail again yesterday, I find it amazing how not much has changed and I leave readers with his words: “I just read your column on the Electoral Act, which indicates that the political brew is beginning to take on the taste of old. Not that it didn’t before, only that its flavour lay hidden in synthetic garnishes. The frail ends are beginning to show but what I see is a sore that has encroached upon the bone. The marrow is next, and when that happens we may be faced with a Bosnia-like scenario of independent warlords. I am worried because what seems to hold the nation together is not law. Nigeria has never had respect for law, but for symbols, whether they represented absolute power or flattered an ethnic sentiment, or promised an illusory dawn. As Henry David Thoreau himself wrote, ‘The law never made anyone a whit more just’…”
NOTE: This series shall be long. Just look out for the continuation.
The authorities must do more to turn the fortunes around
The depressing state of education in the country was again highlighted last week when only 18 per cent of the candidates that sat for the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WASSCE) obtained marks that could get them admission into some of the reasonable universities. According to Olu Adenipekun, head of the National Office of West African Examinations Council (WAEC), 8,113 candidates representing 71.75 per cent obtained credits and above in two subjects in the recently released results. Some 6,375 candidates, representing 56.38 per cent obtained credits and above in three subjects, while 2,010 candidates representing 17.78 per cent obtained credits and above in six subjects. Performance in the key subjects of English and mathematics was down by eight per cent, compared with 26.01 per cent in 2017.
Whatever may be the excuse, the result reflects the long-standing decay in the education sector across the country. Indeed, the sharp academic decline over the years could be attributed largely to the utter neglect of the learning environment. Most schools lack the basic educational infrastructure. This is also true of staffing. Unfortunately, the sorry conditions are all-pervading, across the states. From Kaduna to Benin City, Kebbi to Sapele, the facilities in most schools have either collapsed or decrepit, while the quality of the education being offered is suspect .There are today, classrooms without teachers, or where there are, many can hardly differentiate between blue and black.
Thus, as we have said severally in this space, our post-primary schools need complete overhaul. Government would need to place emphasis on the quality of teachers and teaching as an irreducible minimum. The conditions of service for teachers must be enhanced if the story must change in the education sector. There is need for education policies that would promote teachers’ capacity to meet the needs of the society. Moreover, the relevant stakeholders have to bear in mind that the mass failure in WASSCE which has become an annual fare is also partly the embarrassing outcome of decades of academic fraud spanning all preceding levels of the education system.
Indeed, as we also noted in a recent editorial, the crisis in our educational sector is so total and frightening that nothing short of a well thought-out strategy will do for any meaningful change to occur. It is not a mere declaration of “a state of emergency” across the state in April as Adamu Adamu, the Minister of Education declared recently: “We hope that once this is done our educational sector will improve,” he said. It is more than that. The learning environment, quality of teachers, academic outcomes and the capacity of monitoring institutions are critical to the success of the sector.
On the whole, we need short, medium and long terms plan with clear objectives and measurable timelines to reform the entire educational system. We must fashion out ways by which the federal, states and local governments and stakeholders from the private sector would come together to save secondary education in Nigeria.
Thisday
While attempting to stowaway through some vessels plying the country’s coastal waters, nine Nigerian citizens and a Nigerien were recently apprehended by the Nigerian Immigration Service (NIS). Their hope of securing the so-called “better life” in Europe was therefore dashed. According to media reports, they had been variously assisted into the vessels by some fishermen who ferried them in local boats before getting them aboard the ships which they erroneously presumed to be Europe-bound, not knowing that they were restricted to the West African coastal waters.
Popoola said he and his fellow co-travellers thought that the vessels in which they were apprehended were Europe-bound and that it was better to live as a fugitive in Europe or any other country for that matter than to despair and die in their country which had failed to offer any hope for its teeming unemployed youths. Their desperation has apparently overtaken their sense of safety. Too poor to undertake a legitimate trip, they ironically threw away all fears of death in order to survive and perhaps prevail in extreme circumstances. And even if the steps taken by these obviously misguided youths are faulted for their lack of depth, it is uncharitable not to consider their logic. There would be no desperation to leave Nigeria if life was conducive for Nigerians.
![[OPINION]: Trump, Tillerson, and the restructuring agenda - Femi Mimiko](/media/k2/items/cache/eb9111e6f289d3416d3e10233573274f_M.jpg)
At the sudden firing of the former US Secretary of State, Tex Tillerson, by President Donald Trump (DJT), I had made the following remarks: It couldn’t have been imagined a couple of years ago that a US president would fire his Secretary of State, and on Twitter, while the latter was away on a foreign trip! This detracts greatly from the image and reputation of the US as a stable, ordered, and orderly democracy, where governance is organized in a most systematic manner.
By the way, instability is not just about an incessant and unpredictable change in, and of government – which once characterized Africa. As a conceptual category, it is also about the fact of rapid turnover in personnel of government, the type the Trump White House has come to represent. What we are confronted with in all of this, is the new USA that is fast losing its much-acclaimed exceptionalism, of course with grave implications for not just Americans, but indeed the entire world.
He is an unrepentant populist who will pander to any idea that will earn him some form of applause, no matter from what source, or how despicable such ideas are. He was there for the white supremacists in Charlottesville. He supported Roy More for the Alabama Senate seat. Soon after the man lost the election, Trump claimed he never quite wanted him anyway. He worked against the Democratic candidate, Mr Conor Lamb, in Philadelphia, only to begin to patronize the man as soon as he won the election. This was to the chagrin of his own party, the GOP, whose candidate had just narrowly lost. Trump made a commitment to stand up to the National Rifle Association (NRA) soon after the Parkland shooting, only for him to enunciate a position on gun ‘control’ a few days later that the same NRA found too good to be true.
Trump has demonstrated time and time again that he has very little respect for Africans and other peoples of colour. That is the reality; and there is no basis for any denial on our part, no matter how soothing that may sound and feel.
It is also a fact of the moment that Africa has receded considerably in strategic relevance to the West, especially the US, in the past couple of decades. To assume DJT would go all out in pursuit of a position he feels is worthy and beneficial to Nigerians, therefore, is to miss the point. You take such a step only on behalf of people you respect, not people whose countries you’ll rather see as ‘shithole.’ I am afraid, we have started making the same mistake about DJT as many made on Barack Obama.
When Obama was elected, the whole place (in Africa) was agog as people erroneously assumed he was going to specially benefit Africa because he was supposed to be a black man, of Kenyan origin to boot. We forgot that the guy is as white as he is black. By the way, methinks it is a part of the racist narrative to refer to any white person with a drop of black blood in their vein as black; and not white – assuming whiteness is the preferred category. Anyway, it didn’t take too long for us to realize that Obama was not going to be in any way a benefactor of Africa. That is why in much of the black community in the US today, Bill Clinton remains the first and last ‘black president.’
Now talking specifically about what Obama supposedly did against ‘us’ in 2015, I really fail to recognise any. What did Obama do against Goodluck Jonathan that has not been done against Nicholas Maduro? Why has the moustached one in Caracas not handed over Venezuela to the US by reason of that? I do not think we should lay the failure of Jonathan to assert himself and hold his ground when it mattered, at the doorstep of Obama. Our man simply wasn’t available.
He practically went on vacation, and could not exercise the high office he occupied. Pray, what type of president would leave his presidential palace to attend a meeting called by an American Secretary of State in the US embassy located in his country? In diplomacy, that is tantamount to complete abdication!
I reiterate again that diplomacy is as much a game of substance as it is of symbolism. It was evident that DJT had wanted Tillerson out since the ‘moron’-president incident. He also needed to fire the Secretary in a most disrespectful manner, to sweeten up the revenge. That he chose to do it while the guy was visiting Africa is emblematic of the little regard the US president has for the continent.
He wouldn’t have sacked the man while he was crisscrossing Europe or Asia-Pacific. For God’s sake, firing Tillerson has nothing to do with whatever the former Secretary said or did not say, did or failed to do in Africa, including Nigeria. There is no point in deluding ourselves that he was dropped because he was warm towards PMB. Waiting on DJT to help us advance the frontier of the restructuring battle may mean that we would wait in vain.
It is perhaps only when the White House sees that Nigeria has started imploding that it may be obliged to do something, and mind you, not necessarily for us, but to save us from ourselves, and avert yet another immigrant crisis for the West.
Professor Mimiko is a former vice chancellor
Senator Saidu Umar Kumo represented Gombe Central in the fourth senate on the platform of the defunct All Peoples Party (APP). He was also National Secretary of the defunct All Nigeria Peoples Congress (ANPP) before his appointment as a Special Adviser to the late President Umaru Yar’Adua in 2007.
He explains why he thinks Atiku Abubakar remains the best option for the PDP in next year’s presidential contest.
There was outrage across the country following recent abduction of about 110 girls from Government Girls Technical School Dapchi in Yobe State as well as the attack on Kalabalge in Borno State where UN workers were reportedly killed. Do you see this latest Boko Haram attacks as confirmation that the insurgents still pose a threat contrary to initial claims by government?
In the first place, the insurgency in the north-eastern part of the country is something new entirely. We have never experienced it before. This is the first time this thing is happening in Nigeria. At the beginning of the insurgency, leaders in the country took it for granted. Later it developed to become what it is today. It is now a serious challenge to the entire nation, both to those in authority and the governed. Unfortunately, when the Chibok issue came up, after all the effort and up to this moment, some Nigerians thought we have learnt a lesson and taken security measures in all our schools. But the Dapchi issue has embarrassed the country, embarrassed its leaders because nobody expected that at this time, there will be a re-occurrence of students abduction.
This Dapchi issue has drawn the country back. Even the international community has been taken aback because they had expected our leaders to be on top of the situation by providing adequate security in schools in the trouble states. We cannot continue to blame the military always. The military cannot be everywhere at every time. What about other security operatives who are supposed to compliment the efforts of the military, the military are expected to recover areas from the insurgents and move on. Other security agencies are expected to take over and maintain law and order. Had it been there were some policemen or even mobile policemen stationed in various schools, they would have alerted the military for support or even rescue. Unfortunately, that did not happen.
The Nigerian government never told anyone that they have finished with Boko Haram completely; they merely crippled them as they are no longer a threat as before. They cannot say they have stamped them out completely because it’s not an easy task stamping insurgency out. The Boko Haram do not have peculiar identity, they enter the society and mingle easily. It takes time for security agencies to identify them. It will take a time before it ends completely.
As 2019 general election approaches, there is agitation for the presidential candidate of the PDP to come from the north- east geopolitical zone. Do you think this is possible?
Yes, it is. By God’s grace, we are going to realise it. We are working very hard to make sure the party gives us the opportunity. Of course, some other contestants from other parts of the country are free to show interest but time is coming when we will appeal to them to consider us. Moreover, the person we want is the Wazirin Adamawa, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar. By the Grace of God, he will emerge. However, we have to work together with our colleagues from other parts of the north and other parts of the country. The position has not been micro-zoned to any part of the north. It’s still for the entire north. But we hope to either micro-zone it to the north-east or we would appeal to others to slow down and allow someone from the area to emerge.
Recently you opened the north- east zone Atiku Abubakar Solidarity Office. What makes you think that Atiku could be the best choice for the PDP?
I opened up the zonal solidarity office for Atiku Abubakar to mobilise support for his presidential ambition, which we are part of. I’m telling you, Atiku is long overdue in the PDP to become its presidential candidate and be elected as president. Nigeria of today needs someone like Atiku; there are many challenges that we require someone like him to step into the leadership to bring about an all inclusive administration with focus. He is going to be the right choice for Nigerians. But first, we want him to be the choice of the PDP, when the PDP choose him to become its presidential candidate, then we can sell him to Nigerians.
Talking about presidential aspirants from the north- east, in 2015, you were Director General, Ibrahim Hassan Dankwambo campaign organisation. There is indication that he too is gunning for the PDP presidential ticket. Why are you angling for Atiku to pick the ticket?
I really don’t know that Dankwambo is angling for the presidential ticket. Because he never discussed the issue with me, he never discussed with someone that came to discuss with me, he never sent someone to inform me. My party leadership never called me to say Gombe governor is angling for the PDP presidential ticket. Nobody told me until this moment. I’m not the one to push him and say, ‘come out and contest for this position.’ If he is nursing such ambition, maybe he told those that matter. Maybe they are aware, maybe he didn’t come to our level. But already there is another person that saw us and considers us important in this project and we are for him. That doesn’t mean he cannot gun for the ticket, he must work for it. But for me, I have made my position clear; everybody knows I’m for Atiku in the north- east and Nigeria.
In the north- east, only Gombe and Taraba States belong to the PDP. Do you see this as a challenge to Atiku’s presidential ambition?
Recently, the lingering crisis within the PDP took a turn for the worst with the defection of some founding members of the party like Profs Jerry Gana and Adeniran to the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Do you see this as a challenge to the chances of the PDP in the 2019 presidential election?
When parties lose election, particularly big parties, like the PDP that was in power for 16 years, what people don’t understand is that, if care is not taken, the party will go into disarray. People are yet to know what it meant to be in the opposition, how the opposition suffers. They don’t know how to build an opposition. They expected the thinking to be rowdy. Although, we know the convention has come and gone, with all that happened, at least, we want to put it behind us. As family members of the party, there should be deliberate effort to pacify people but that is what is lacking today or it’s not as we expected. That’s the reason some of them are moving away. Today, in the political terrain of Nigeria, there are only two good platforms, either the PDP or APC. All the rest are weak, they cannot carry the burden of promoting contestants. I also moved out but I came back because some people prevailed on me. We need to prevail on them to come back. They left out of annoyance not because they sincerely prefer life outside the PDP. We need to include leaders of the party, supporters and stalwarts of the party to prevail on them to come back to the party, not only them, but to open our doors for others to come in. It’s unfortunate this is happening at this material time. We all knew what happened during the convention, which resulted in this crisis. Whether we like it or not, this is a challenge to us, which points the way to build and bring up an opposition party. There is nothing PDP can do today to deny the fact that we are in the opposition. We have to behave like the opposition and not to carry on as if we are still in power. We should stop thinking as if we are still in power. Nobody owns this party; PDP belongs to all Nigerians and board members of the PDP. It’s sad; we cannot afford to lose a member not to mention those with influences. I believe the party leadership would look into it and see how we can reunite ourselves as one family.
Coming back home, Gombe State since its creation in 1996 has evolved into a model for others to emulate. However, it’s obvious there are still challenges facing the people. What can you say are these challenges and how do you think they can be surmounted?
Gombe is supposed to be a model and is still is to some states created at the same time with us and even some older states. By God’s Grace, Gombe is today ahead of even some older states. As of today, no matter what you do, there are still some issues of development. No matter what, particularly in terms of infrastructure, you cannot get it all, you have to start and finish some and start initiating some. Don’t forget, we had only three administrations on our own. The first was under Hashidu, which was not given the chance because he ruled for only four years. Since it was the first civilian administration, it came with its peculiar challenges. Hashidu could not perform because of the prevailing situation. Secondly, Goje came and tried his best. He started to put up some of the things we have today. Then Dankwambo came and he did very well in terms of infrastructure.
Nevertheless, he cannot have it all as there are funding challenges. What the state used to get has gone down. He had to slow down to do mostly those projects that he deemed necessary. In that respect, I don’t have quarrelled with that, Gombe has gone somewhere and we want whoever is coming to build on that. This second tenure, the pace of development has slowed down possibly because of the shortfall in revenue. Things changed and you can see how the prices of everything skyrocketed. All these are part of the challenges. We believe he will be able to do something before the end of his tenure and it’s our hope that whoever is elected will come to build on it.
Sun
The recent disclosure by the Director General of the United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO), Jose Graziano da Silva, that African countries should create 12 million new jobs annually over the next 20 years to confront and halt ravaging unemployment on the continent, is a wake-up call on African governments.
African countries must heed to the advice of the FAO boss because unemployment, especially youth unemployment, remains a ticking time bomb, which may explode anytime with dire consequences. We are worried that successive governments in Africa are rather paying lip service to the unemployment problem instead of confronting it decisively.
Although unemployment challenge differs from country to country in Africa, its magnitude is high throughout the continent. While unemployment was hardly a problem in Libya under the late Muammar Gaddafi, the situation is not the same now that the country is suffering from instability. Most North African countries have less unemployment.
But, the unemployment situation elsewhere on the continent is dire. Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, has the most unemployment challenge. The Nigerian Bureau of Statistics (NBS) recently put the number of the unemployed as at Q3 2017 at 15.99 million and the underemployed at 18 million. The youth constitute about 40 per cent of the unemployed population
As a direct response to this challenge, millions of these youths brave the risk of voluntary enslavement in other countries in their search for greener pastures. Some of them travel through the risky Mediterranean Sea on their way to Europe. Some have died in the process.
There is hardly any justification for the grave unemployment situation on the continent. Government in Africa must create more jobs for the unemployed, especially in rural areas. The growing army of unemployed people in Africa must be gainfully engaged for the continent to develop. Africa cannot develop when those that constitute the active population are not working.
We agree that creating 12 million jobs over the next 20 years, which would translate to 240 million jobs, is a good starting point. African countries can even go beyond this estimation.
African governments must use agriculture to create more jobs and develop the continent. Agriculture remains the continent’s best route to full and gainful youth employment. But, to attain the laudable goal, a lot of attention and resources must be committed to rural and integrated infrastructural development and transformation.
Farm settlements, complete with modern and enough infrastructure support were established in well-targeted parts of the country. Agriculture provided adequate employment for the rural populace and largely addressed the problem of unemployment.
After groping in the dark for nearly two decades, state assemblies have acquiesced to the clamour for their autonomy. They are set to liberate themselves from being appendages of the governors, a move that will place their funding in the first line charge. Epileptic funding of the assemblies has been used by the Executive arm of government in many states to turn them like a dice.
However, the new lease of life will only come into effect after the ongoing Second Amendment to the 1999 Constitution by the National Assembly must have been consummated. This is a welcome development. Curiously, state lawmakers had jettisoned the proposal when it was first made by the Seventh National Assembly, following pressure from the governors, who wanted to keep them under their perpetual control.
It was not by accident that the founding fathers of democracy created the executive, legislative and the judicial arms of government, with well defined responsibilities, and each acting as a check on the other. This pristine arrangement is fundamental in a democracy. Where the legislature’s autonomy is eroded or lacking, what exists is anything but democracy.
Regrettably, such has been the lot of most states in Nigeria since 1999. Most governors have subjugated their state assemblies or, worse still, the assemblies have become willing tools in their hands, thereby betraying the trust of the people they purport to represent. As a result, many governors behave like emperors, embezzle and misappropriate public funds and defy all measures to make them accountable.
But in a democracy, the assemblies exist to make laws for good governance. Their major work, however, lies in oversight in the ministries, departments and agencies to ensure that value for money in public expenditure is religiously observed. But this has not been so. As evidence shows, they are mere rubber stamps of the executive.
However, it is hoped that their expected independence should translate into radical change in governance or service-delivery. Absence of this is responsible for about 15 ex-governors standing trial for hundreds of billions of naira allegedly looted while they were in office, majority of them since 2007. A survey by this newspaper in 2011 showed that only Rivers, Imo, Lagos and Oyo states included their security votes (funds) in the budget. The budgeted security votes ranged from N2.5 billion to N7.5 billion.
Incredibly, governors of 32 other states dipped their hands in the treasury and spent as they liked. Whether budgeted or not, the expenditure is never accounted for. This is alien to the 1999 Constitution. Security vote is a conduit for siphoning public funds and this should be stopped by the state lawmakers. That Rabiu Kwankwaso claimed he never collected any fund under this guise when he was in charge as governor of Kano State provides proof of its dubiety. He was once quoted as saying, “Security vote anywhere is stealing. I don’t believe in it….” What makes the expenditure more questionable is that robbery, kidnapping, cultism and unwarranted killings of innocent people are hardly tamed, despite the humungous amount appropriated as security vote. Evidently, they are on the ascendancy.
Lawmakers’ ignorance of their role in a democracy and indolence have deviously served not a few governors’ interests, as seen in the misappropriation of the N1.9 trillion bailout of the Federal Government to states to assist them clear the salary arrears of their workers. However, it is heartwarming that one of the legislatures in the Southern part of the country has recently found its voice to demand from the governor how he spent the Paris Club debt refund, as it considers the 2018 Appropriation Bill. Unfortunately, the refund has become a slush fund, rather than one to be budgeted and accounted for.
Elected representatives who are responsive and beholden to the constitution cannot pander to the recklessness of any state chief executive or be blind to his stewardship. The World Bank’s advice on this suffices. The parliament, being in control, it argued, would be “incomplete as long as government continued to enjoy wide discretion in spending public revenue.”
Power, as John Acton, the University of Cambridge historian, famously stated, “tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” These immortal words should guide each state assembly in stemming the incongruity of a governor acting like a bull in a china shop. Governors should be compelled to be transparent and accountable to the people. A state legislature that is delinquent in forcing this through has definitely lost its legitimacy.
Punch
![[OPINION]: Osinbajo confirms Buhari’s impotence -Abimbola Adelakun](/media/k2/items/cache/311c2d9a9ca3cf14ee5f7b30373d50e3_S.jpg)
If Vice President Yemi Osinbajo expected a public outrage at his latest revelation that the whopping sums of N100 billion and $289 million were embezzled by the Goodluck Jonathan administration weeks to the 2015 elections, he must be disappointed by now.
Up till now, nobody is exactly asking for Jonathan’s head on a spike. Osinbajo has confirmed people’s suspicion: that Buhari, the man who was elected to tear down the temple of corruption in Nigeria is not as potent a force as he was marketed. Nigerians that thought they were getting two raging bulls must be wondering how they ended up with these hand-wringing jokers. Osinbajo should not be surprised at the yawns and wrinkled noses he got from Nigerians for his exposé, people now think that still blaming Jonathan is an old subterfuge considering everything else that has befallen us under Buhari.
If Jonathan and his merry band stole so much and up till now, the best you do is throw out repetitive lines of how much he stole; maybe you should not be in government. Nigerians voted you to fight corruption, not to join them to moan about it.
This day three years ago, it was five days before the presidential elections. Everywhere you turned at that time, you heard “Sai Baba” chanted to the tune of “anti-corruption.” Followers of the candidate and now President, Muhammadu Buhari, evangelized about the coming of this messiah whose no-nonsense stance will cleanse Nigeria’s Augean stables for good.
Even his former foes forgave him without him asking. Buhari himself, aware of the weight of expectations imposed on him, sold himself as the karma of corruption in Nigeria. Everywhere he went, he sang about fighting corruption and Nigerians rocked themselves to its sonic sensation.
When Buhari was first sworn in, bragging about what Jonathan’s administration had done wrong was the most priced and bestselling share on the stock market, and the APC — still basking in the euphoria of unexpected victory — made huge dividends out of it. Almost three years after he was sworn in, the folks who rhapsodized about Buhari’s anti-corruption agenda have found that he was no different from his predecessor. He is just as clueless, and corruption — Nigeria’s Frankenstein monster — has once again swallowed another one of its creators. Post-2015 Nigeria is still in the doldrums of ineptitude, nepotism, tribalism, and uncontained violence.
Osinbajo is still talking about what Jonathan did wrong when their government has barely been able to do a single thing convincingly right.
Osinbajo was also quoted as saying that at some point, those who promoted strategic alliance contracts between the NNPC and the NDPC made away with almost one-tenth of our national reserves! That is a mind-boggling amount. Such a theft ought to be thoroughly investigated and punished, and not just crunched into a sensational speech at an occasion. Osinbajo, again, said that it was only in talking about such mega-thefts that we could resolve such thieving.
True, he has a point that such scams need to be addressed, but he seems to forget that talking is all Buhari’s government has done till now. People are tired of accusations; they are tiring and demoralizing. What we want to see is what the government under his watch has done about such embezzlements. How many of those people have been tried and how many are on their way to jail now? If nothing of the sort has been done, then what is the point of informing us who stole what? You are only confirming that you are weak, and your government is more or less a paper tiger.
Mentioning Jonathan’s name alone used to be a potent means of whipping Nigerians into frenzied outrage about “corruption,” but people seem to be fatigued about the unending talk of what is wrong; they want transparency, reforms, and action. They are bored with people like Osinbajo constantly revving the engine of a vehicle that has no wheels.
Not only are officials of this administration adept at just talk, they, in fact, act as a striptease. Just a few days ago, the Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), also said that if he released details of the allowances of the principal officers of the National Assembly, Nigerians would be shocked. But what exactly would be shocking to Nigerians about his revelations considering that Sagay already informed Nigerians last year that lawmakers earned as much as N29m monthly? What else is “shockable” about what he has to reveal?
At worst, he will reveal that Senate President, Bukola Saraki possibly earns N1bn monthly. Even if we find out that things are that sordid, what exactly is the reaction he expects the shock we will experience to solve?
Sagay thinks Nigeria will explode if people find out what the lawmakers cost them but most people know, just like they know that Buhari’s budget is just as padded as was his predecessors’. They just insist on keeping their sanity intact by ignoring their thieving leaders. I think Sagay — much like Peter Obi who also teased us with information about what governors earn — is over-estimating the capability of Nigerians to be still shocked with the mindless looting that goes on in the country every day. Nigerians have come to realize that both the APC and the PDP are bad for their mental and moral health, and there is nothing one side can accuse the other of that it is not guilty of too.
That is why Osinbajo’s revelation did not get much more than sneers and jeers. He is working in an administration whose anti-corruption agenda has become more or less reduced to accusations and counter-accusations, and he wants us to be moved by Jonathan’s profligacy.
Since Buhari became president, his cronies too have been accused of corruption, seven million people have lost their jobs between 2016 and 2017, and Nigerians have yet to recover from the effects of a recession. Think of the degree of violence that has occurred under Buhari, from the killings in Benue to Kaduna, Enugu, Taraba, and the abduction of girls in Dapchi. How about those for “shock” and explosion?
If the country did not go on the streets to protest after Buhari spent half of last year abroad, and up till now he has still not accounted for how much his health cost the country, then what is Sagay worried about?
There is every possibility that Osinbajo is right that Jonathan plundered the nation for his re-election. All the money Jonathan’s administration spent in 2015, particularly in the last few weeks of the election when he was crawling on his knees from churches to traditional rulers must have come from somewhere other than his pocket. But Osinbajo will not get the reaction he expects from Nigerians this time because Buhari himself has not shown superior morals when it comes to the issue of dipping your hands into the national pockets.
1n 2015, Buhari did not finance his campaign with five loaves and two fishes. The money too came from somewhere, and we know it was not his putatively untainted pockets. In fact, Buhari has that mystique about him: he has a way of making people believe he is personally not corrupt even though whenever he has needed money to finance his ambition, somebody’s dirty hands have picked up the invoice. Up till now, nobody in the APC has had the honour or dignity to account for their campaign spending yet they cry about others’ faults.
By 2019, they are likely to do exactly what they accuse Jonathan of: take money out of the national reserves to finance their campaigns too. That is why their moral posturing moves nobody whose head on his/her shoulders can think their way out of a paper bag.
![[Opinion]: Time to focus on how states are governed - Jideofor Adibe](/media/k2/items/cache/ddd6024489ec02ba94fa623572f89a37_S.jpg)
There are lots to be read into the recent report by the Fiscal Responsibility Commission on the debt profile of various state governments in 2016. According to the Punch of March 20 2018, which reported extensively on the report, the debt profiles of about 18 states exceeded their gross and net revenues by more than 200 per cent. The paper quoted the FRC as saying that the debt may have increased by 2017 since “there was no effort by the states to clear them”. It also quoted the FRC as saying that the development was contrary to the guidelines of the Debt Management Office on debt sustainability, which recommends that the debt status of each state should not exceed 50 per cent of the statutory revenue in the previous 12 months. “In the light of the DMO’s guidelines on the Debt Management Framework, specifically, sections 222 to 273 of the Investment and Securities Act, 2007 pertaining to debt sustainability, according to the guidelines, the debt to income ratio of states should not exceed 50 per cent of the statutory revenue for the preceding 12 months,” the FRC was quoted as saying.
Analysis of the FRC report (which was based on the debt profile of the states as of December 31, 2016) showed that most of the states of the federation flouted the regulation as they exceeded their debt to revenue ratio by more than 100 per cent. According to the report, the worst offenders were Lagos (670.42 per cent), Osun (539.25 per cent), Cross River (486.49 per cent), Plateau (342.01 per cent), Oyo (339.56 per cent), Ekiti (339.34 per cent), Ogun (329.47 per cent), Kaduna (297.26 per cent) and Imo (292.82 per cent). Others were Edo (270.8 per cent), Adamawa (261.96 per cent), Delta (259.63 per cent), Bauchi (250.75 per cent), Nasarawa (250.36 per cent), Kogi (221.92 per cent), Enugu (207.49 per cent), Zamfara (204.91 per cent), and Kano (202.61 per cent).
According to the report, the debt to net revenue of the states puts some of the states in even more precarious situation. For instance while the debt to net revenue of Lagos State is a whopping 930.96 per cent that of Cross Rivers State is 940.64 per cent.
The report found that the only states whose debts did not exceed the recommended 50 per cent ratio by more than 100 per cent were Anambra, Borno, Jigawa, Kebbi, Sokoto, Yobe and the Federal Capital Territory.
Several extrapolations could be made from the above set of frightening figures:
One, the amount of revenue accruing to a state has no relationship with its debt profile. For instance Lagos State which has the highest debt to gross revenue ratio of 670.42 per cent (and debt to net revenue of 930.96 per cent), is one of the highest receivers of funds from the Federation Account. It has also one of the best internally generated revenue profiles (thanks in part to the location of prime businesses there). In September 2017 for instance, it received from the Federation Account N8.8bn, compared to say Borno and Anambra which received less than half of what it got from the Federation Account alone during the period and yet stayed within the recommended 50 per cent to revenue ratio. Remarkably none of the top receivers of funds from the Federation Account – Akwa Ibom, Delta, Rivers, Bayelsa, Kano and Kaduna States – made it in the ‘honours’ list.
In fact the states whose debt did not exceed the recommended 50 per cent ratio by more than 100 per cent according to FRC received the following sums in September 2017 from the Federation Account (I am using a random month and year for which data on what was received by all the states are available): Anambra (N4.3bn), Borno (N4.9bn), Jigawa, (N4.67) Kebbi (N4.26), Sokoto (N4.1bn), Yobe (N4.15bn). In contrast, the top receivers of funds, which did not make the ‘honours’ list received the following sums during the period: Delta (N14.2), Akwa Ibom (N12.94bn), Rivers (N12.45bn), Kano (N6.8bn) and Kaduna (N5.4bn). In the same vein, Osun, which is the poorest state in the country in terms of sums received from the Federation Account, (it got only N1.6bn during the period) was not listed among the states with the highest debt to gross revenue ratios. One of the conclusions from this would be the wise words of Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the USA: “Money never made a man happy yet, nor will it. The more a man has, the more he wants. Instead of filling a vacuum, it makes one.”
Two, a survey published in May 2017 by BudGIT, (a civic organisation founded in 2011 to simplify the budget and matters of public spending for citizens), found that most states, including some top receivers of funds from the Federation Account and many heavily indebted states, owed workers arrears in salary and pension payments.
Among the States which it found were not owing salaries were Anambra, Borno, Akwa Ibom, Cross River, Kaduna, Kano, Kebbi, Lagos, Plateau, Sokoto and Yobe. Remarkably while rich Delta State and Bayelsa States owed upwards of six months salaries, Yobe, Kebbi and Anambra which receive less than half of what they get from the Federation Account did not owe any salary arrears. The above raises the question of whether revenues accruing to states are good indicators of the viability of states. It will seem from the above that the capacity for governance and managing resources may be better indicators of state viability than the quantum of money that flows to states.
Three, while oil money controlled by the federal government has made it the central site of the intra elite struggles for power and privileges, a commensurate attention is not paid at what happens at the state levels. In fact while the country’s democracy is in a transition mode at the federal level, it appears to be suffering from arrested development at the state levels. Just consider these: In Imo state, which was found by BudGIT to owe primary school teachers two months arrears of salary and pensioners 24 months arrears in May 2017, the government strangely found enough resources to build statutes of personalities that caught his fancy, including that of Jacob Xuma, former President of South Africa, who is now facing corruption charges in his country. The same Governor gave the ministerial slot for his state to his father-in-law and is now pushing for his son in-law to succeed him. In Kaduna state, an otherwise smart governor had to pull down a house belonging to his political opponent. In virtually all the States, the Governors behave like monarchs rather than elected executives that are accountable to the electorate. Is there any State in the country where the State House of Assembly is not a rubber stamp of the Governor? Is it possible for a State Governor to lose a court case in the State’s High Court? Can the party of a state Governor lose Local Government elections in the State? Compared to what is happening at the state level, the federal government seems to be doing well.
Four, what the different ethnic and regional factions of the political class demand from the federal government, they often negate when it comes to their own states. For instance, while we all extol the unwritten power rotation agreement between the Northern and Southern parts of the country, will it be a crime for the politicians to respect the same principle in their states? Will it for instance be a crime for a power rotation arrangement in Benue, Kaduna, Taraba and several other states in the country so that all the key constituents of a State will have a good opportunity of producing the Governor of the State? Several states in the country need restructuring, not just the federal government.
The hullabaloo over Senators’ N13.5m monthly ‘running cost’
The recent revelation by Senator Shehu Sani (Kaduna Central) that each Senator receives the whopping sum of N13.5m as running cost - on top of N700,000 monthly consolidated salary and allowances - has led to justified anger in the land. I join in condemnation of bogus payments. But I will like also to put a caveat: several comparisons of what the Senators earn with what their counterparts earn in Europe, USA and elsewhere earn, miss the context. The truth is that the electorate in Nigeria (and virtually all parts of Africa) are manifestly different from their European and American counterparts. For instance while the constituents of a Nigerian Senator expect him or her to attend funerals, naming ceremonies and launchings of all hues and to be among the highest donors in such events, there are no such expectations on their American and European counterparts. Nigerian Senators, like political office holders, are also expected to become cash cows and to donate handsomely wherever they go and their presence is acknowledged including in churches and mosques.
This is not a justification for any jumbo pay when most Nigerians are just trying to scrape by but to give a sense of proportion to the conversation.
Again, it is important for us to compare like-for-like. So if we are justifiably angry at what Senators take home every month, we must also know how much top members of the executive and the judiciary take home – in consolidated monthly salary and monthly ‘running cost’.
__________________________
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Twitter: @JideoforAdibe
![[OPINION]: The national trust deficit - Matthew Hassan Kukah](/media/k2/items/cache/bbddf62f90810cd46f576e13c5c04d9b_S.jpg)
Whether at a wedding ceremony, a funeral or a birthday party, on the street, in the motor park, train station, inside or outside the Church or mosque, at Seminars, conferences, at the bar or on a dinning table, it is impossible for two or more Nigerians to have a normal conversation without veering into the mood of desolation that has gripped the nation. Both the Party in power, which ordinarily should be swooning in a muscular mood of joie de vivre, hoisting its victorious flags of achievements, consolidating its gains, and the Opposition Parties which should be exposing the underbelly of the party in power, scheming, plotting and mobilizing how to dethrone them seem to be in a state of stupor, like synchronized swimmers in a sea of confusion and self abnegation.
Everywhere you turn, we are faced with the dilemma of the blind man chasing a black cat in a dark room. The most visible common denominator that defines the mood of the nation is that we are all a nation of sad people with heads drooping everywhere. Individuals, communities seem to have all turned to the Book of Lamentation for inspiration and solace. Both members of the party in power and the opposition seem to be wearing the same jerseys of sadness. Everywhere is full of stories of perceived and alleged feelings of treachery and betrayal. The nation has never been in this kind of collective national mood of self-doubt.
For most part of the year, we have listened to stories of alleged unfair distribution of offices, positions and privileges among the elites. In response, the federal government has laboured to make the point that this government has been fair in its allocation of offices, traversing ethnic, religious and regional boundaries and that indeed, as one newspaper stated, Christians have done better or have had more opportunities than Muslims or something to that effect. Sadly, this elite monologue suggests that elite interests trump the survival of our people, why they are hungry, sick and dying daily.
Those who govern us have never seriously attempted to answer the question as to what is wrong with our country. They have never attempted to find out what government is doing wrong and how people continue to feel so frustrated.
It reminds me of a little story of a man whose wife left him with his three children and went off to the market. He settled down in his sitting room to read the newspaper and decided that the best way to relax is to bribe the children with something to keep them busy. He looked at the refrigerator and found many oranges. He then peeled and gave each child an orange and warned them not to disturb him.
Shortly afterwards, there was a fight. Rather than asking what the problem was, he simply went out and brought another orange and gave the youngest child who was the one crying. No sooner had dad settled down than little Jonnie let out another cry. Dad opened the fridge, brought out more oranges and started peeling them when his wife came in. Her little son was still crying and she went over to him, hugged him and asked what happened. The little child told her mother that her brothers had refused to give him the seeds of their oranges which he wanted to use to improve his counting skills!
There we are: the father felt that he knew what the children wanted and because there were many oranges in the fridge, all he thought needed to be done was to bring out more oranges. The maternal instincts acted differently. Oil money has closed the rational and creative part of the brains of those who govern us. Money is everything and feeds everything in our lives.
The Nigerian state has become an insensitive father because the fridge of full of oranges. This is why the country is littered with an ocean of abandoned projects, broken dreams and has become a massive graveyard of ideas half-baked and ill conceived. It is unlikely that our circles of sorrow are about to end.
Even the bitterest enemy of Nigeria could never ever have imagined that we will be stranded on a highway to nowhere as we are now. But here we are drinking the daily vinegar of blood and death. All hope is not lost, but we need to urgently call the map-readers in so we can at least trace our steps back to the right path.
On being asked where Daily Trust will be in another 20 years, its founding father, my friend, Kabiru Yusuf admitted that the future lay in stepping up in a world of digital learning. Owners of Daily Trust must learn the lessons that have stunted the north. I looked at the masthead of Daily Trust and it does show an appreciation of diversity as key to innovation and survival. It is all Men, and all Muslim, bar one Indian. No Woman, Christian. The paper will not survive if it does not urgently lift this dark veil and deliberately cultivates diversity, innovation and ideas.
Kukah, the Catholic Bishop of Sokoto Diocese, contributed this piece to Daily Trust @ 20
More...
The Presidency said last week that President Muhammadu Buhari queried Inspector General of Police Ibrahim Kpotun Idris for not obeying his directive to move to Benue State to arrest the crisis between farmers and herdsmen. During a visit to Benue State last week, the state’s elders complained to Buhari that the IGP did not obey his order to relocate to the state. The president responded by expressing surprise and shock and he said, “I did not know that IG did not stay in the state.”
There was some confusion as to what actually happened because the police denied that their boss received a query. Last Monday the police provided an indirect response to the presidency when it broadcast a one hour documentary on the Nigeria Television Authority’s [NTA] network service. The documentary was impressive because it gave a blow by blow account of IG Idris’ visit to Benue State, with a promise to air another documentary this weekend. The documentary showed that Idris promptly arrived in Makurdi and held meetings with community leaders including Governor Samuel Ortom. He then paid a visit to the Tor Tiv and had a lengthy exchange with him, after which he left the next day for Nasarawa State.
Soon afterwards, the documentary showed him returning to Benue State where he moved around the troubled Loko and Guma Local government areas, variously by vehicles and by helicopter. Not only did he address several meetings of community leaders and urged them to cooperate with the police to keep the peace, but he was also overheard on camera giving instructions about the deployment of the ten additional units of mobile policemen that he redeployed to the state. This video evidence supplied by the police suggests that the IG substantially complied with the president’s order to go to Benue and strengthen security arrangements.
Serious though the situation in Benue was, we think it was wrong of the Benue elders to expect the IG to permanently relocate to their state. This is because he is heading a force that covers 36 states and FCT, with many units serving abroad. He owes it a duty to all of them to maintain an eye on happenings across the country. The confusion arose due to President Buhari’s tendency to order security chiefs to relocate to trouble spots without clarifying the meaning of relocation. For example, in his inaugural address in 2015 he ordered military service chiefs to relocate to Maiduguri. The service chiefs briefly did so and since then they have been frequent visitors to the North East and the war fronts. From all indications they satisfied Buhari’s expectations and they have certainly made a difference in the war against Boko Haram.
However, the president himself will be hampered in his functions if the service chiefs, including the IGP, are to stay out of Abuja for prolonged periods. In the case of Benue, what was clearly required was for the IG to put in place adequate security measures to stop the incessant killings. By moving ten units of mobile police and leaving behind a Deputy Inspector General, he has succeeded in reducing the killings even though some ugly incidents still occurred.
We therefore believe the brouhaha over the IG disobeying orders was unnecessary. Next time when aggrieved politicians complain against a top security official, we urge the president to tarry awhile and investigate it, rather than accept their word for it.
Daily Trust
![[OPINION]: Time to tell the North: Think - Yakubu Mohammed](/media/k2/items/cache/a30fffe76f99bff588b63288d98bfb04_XS.jpg)
As I write this with pain in my heart, the headlines in one or two newspapers sound familiar enough: “suspected herdsmen kill traditional ruler, wife and nine others in Kogi”. The story had it that the Onu Agbenema, Musa Edibo and his wife had been killed along with eight other persons while many houses were burnt by suspected herdsmen in separate attacks on Agbenema, Aj’Ichekpa, Opapda and Iyade viallges in Dekina and Omala Local Government Areas.
These latest killings came less than one week after the first major massacre in Dekina, Bassa and Omala local governemt areas of the state took place with more than 25 people killed. The governor of the state, Yahaya Bello, promptly took off from the capital and drove for about 14 hours on very bad roads to get to the scene of deaths to condole the victims. He promised succour for the people and vowed that it would not happen again. Of course it happened again. And if sincere measures are not put in place by government to checkmate these incessant killings, they will happen again.
Apparently, the more officialdom and other concerned people condemn and bemoan the killings, the more the bloodletting by these merchants of death. The latest voice against continued anarchy is that of the Jama’atu Nasril Islam, the umbrella organisation of the Muslim community in the country led by the Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III. The body called on the president to wake up to his responsibility of safeguarding the lives and properties of the people. Nobel Laureate Wole Soyinka had sounded similar note of warning against allowing Nigeria to drift into a state of anomie akin to Hobbesian state of nature.
But do all these admonitions have the desired effect? Our search for a way out makes it mandatory that we begin to look beyond the cattle herdsmen. They may not be the sole culprit in this drama of untrammelled tragedy with surreal implications for national cohesion. Crime and criminality, we are begging to learn, have a notorious capacity to give birth to petty but dare-devil adherents in all communities. It is amenable to producing a franchise for anyone so criminally minded especially in communities that have a fertile and conducive atmosphere for such criminal activities.
Armed robbery, for instance, was in existence before the civil war. But incidences of robbery were an occasional thing. But it became more ferocious after the war with the proliferation of illegal arms in hands of trained and untrained gunmen. Before we knew it, it had spread round.
The recent episode of kidnapping started, possibly, from the creeks in the Niger Delta and it became a profitable venture because the victims, mainly expatriates, had to cough out some princely ransom to regain their freedom. It had now assumed epidemic proportion.
What am saying is that kidnappers, both their apprentice and the veterans, have all procured the franchise from the creeks and turned the evil practice into Nigeria’s growth industry. Is it for nothing that Boko Haram has split into various groups - divided along ideological lines but prompted mainly by the possibility of the ransom they stand to extort when they lay their hands on innocent school girls?
As we battle the menace of the Fulani cattle herdsmen, it is appropriate not to lose sight of the fact that these devils with AK 47 may not be the herdsmen we think they are. Tongues are wagging. There are speculations about the ethnicity and nationality of some of the raiders that have fallen in recent battles. Certainly not all of them are cattle herdsmen, not from their look, not from their shape. Certainly not with the kind of arms they are reported to be carrying for their deadly exploits.
But since the herders have opened the doors to other assorted criminals with sophisticated weapons of mass destruction, they, the flag bearers, must be prepared to take the blame. And the security men must sincerely, and with the fear of God, do what is necessary to safeguard lives and property.
We know that the police are ill-equipped and poorly motivated, but for goodness sake when the commander-in-chief, gives an order to the Inspector General of Police to relocate to troubled spots at least for purpose of symbolic presence, he should do so, even if he is convinced that disobedience of such order may not carry any consequences. Truth is criminality grows and thrives in a society where law and order have broken down irretrievably. We pray we don’t get to that point soon.
In a way there is a feeling of déjà vu in this grotesquely macabre narrative of the tales of horror - even of arson, of death and destruction, of sleepless nights, of internally displaced persons who are running from home that is no longer safe and secure. The Western Nigeria of the mid-sixties had the distinction of being the wild, wild west, when Operation Wetie became the unauthorised but potent weapon of revenge or an act of vengeance.
You would recall that soon after independence, the struggle for political supremacy in the country was the next thing to a civil war. The two overlords in the West were the venerable Chief Obafemi Jeremiah Oyeniyi Awolowo, the first Premier of Western Region and leader of Action Group and his deputy in the party, Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola.
Somewhere along the line, the two political juggernauts fell apart over ideological differences and Chief Akintola, popularly known as SLA went into another party, Nigerian National Democratic Party which was in alliance with the Northern Peoples Congress, the dominant party in the North and at the federal level. Akintola capitalised on the alliance to form what was seen as a minority government in West.
Not done, the new government began to dismantle the structures of the AG, the dominant party of the majority of the people in the West. The matter came to a head when the general masses of the AG supporters rose up in arms; they began to attack the big men who backed Akintola. Not only did they burn down their homes and properties, they set fire to those they could lay their hands on. Some newspapers came out the following day with the grisly headline: Oba roasted!
The sad spectacle of the then wild West gave rise to Hubert Ogunde’s immortal hit song Yoruba ronu, which was an exhortation for the Yoruba, easily one of the most enlightened group, to Think! Though the hit song was a stinging criticism of Akintola but the entire Yoruba race was forced vicariously to share in the strictures. Today, the so-called wild west has turned a full circle. Not only they are no longer wild, the people have gone far ahead of their contemporaries in education, art and culture, social and economic development. With their level of enlightenment getting to stratospheric level, every one, literate and not so literate, is fully aware of his rights and God save you, if you make any attempt to cheat him.
The other day, President Buhari was said to have admonished Nigerians from the North to learn one or two things from the Yoruba’s level of social and religious tolerance. Perhaps, the North will need to invent its own Ogunde, revamp its education and re-examine its leadership recruitment process to stop charlatans, whose only qualification is their bottomless capacity to steal money, from getting into public office and play any leadership role.
It is time to tell the North, Think.
Now, Nigerians know how their legislators have been bleeding the system through their jumbo pay
Senator Shehu Sani deserves all the accolades he has received over the disclosure of the jumbo salaries and allowances being paid our senators. The senator representing Kaduna Central District in the upper legislative chamber caused an uproar when he explained that each senator goes home with a consolidated salary of N750,000 monthly, but is equally paid N13.5 million as running cost.
Senator Sani’s disclosure has only confirmed the speculation that our lawmakers are stupendously paid. As a matter of fact, many Nigerians have always believed that they are the most pampered legsilators in the world. So, in a sense, Nigerians have always known this; but what they did not know was the exact amount involved.
In a country where the minimum wage remains a meager N18,500 monthly, and many youths are unemployed, it is mindboggling that the federal account could be debited with so much for each senator. Similarly, each member of the House of Representatives goes home with N12 million as running cost.
Design and execution of projects are the exclusive preserve of the executive arm of government. Not only do the legislators insist on, and get N200 million projects allocated to each of them, they nominate the contractors and supervise the projects. In some cases, despite release of funds, the projects are abandoned, apparently because the legislators have a hand in the execution. This is an aberration, and an indication that corruption has become the norm.
We are aghast that despite the parlous state of the economy occasioned partly by the sharp drop in the price of crude oil, the mainstay of the economy, the legislators have not deemed it fit to slash their insensitive and unsustainable pay.
The Revenue Mobilisation, Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) must be empowered to take full charge of all allowances and emoluments to all public officers, including the politicians. It is criminal for anyone being funded from the Federation Account to do so outside the purview of the commission, and concomitantly, the general public.
These indefensible sundry demands on the federal purse are mere symptoms of the deep malaise afflicting the system. Unless there is a general restructuring of the polity in such a way that the federating units are empowered to generate and expend their resources, the malady will continue, with attention being only occasionally called to the branches.
Nigerians owe themselves a duty to insist that a thorough survey and review of the system is undertaken with a view to fundamentally reworking the Nigerian federal system and ensure that all arms of government and institutions conform to the demand of Rule of Law and probity.
The present standard of the police is unacceptable
The recent invasion by unknown gunmen of a police station in Gbako Local Government Area of Niger State where some detained criminals were released points to the pathetic state of the police in Nigeria today. While the Commissioner of Police, Mr. Dibal Paul Yakadi, reportedly rushed to the community following the development, the state government imposed a dusk-to-dawn curfew and mobilised vigilance group to go after the gunmen and arrest them. Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident as many police stations in our country have, at different times, been sacked by gunmen.
From Benue to Adamawa to Taraba and Zamfara States, criminal gangs seem to have overpowered the capacity of the state to restore order with hundreds of citizens killed almost on a regular basis. But it becomes a far more serious challenge when the police can no longer protect their own men and barracks from the onslaught of sundry criminal cartels. In January last year, for instance, two officers were injured when hoodlums invaded a police station in Suleja, also in Niger State, to free their detained colleagues. Numbering over 20 and armed with cutlasses, daggers, axes and sticks, the hoodlums reportedly first issued an ultimatum to the policemen on duty before they overpowered them. What that suggests is an urgent need to reform the institution if the men and officers must regain public confidence.
In the country today, especially in recent times, the police have failed in their duty of maintaining law and order, internal security, intelligence gathering and in checking the increasing wave of crime. So incapable of delivering on its mandate has the institution become that a huge slice of the military asset is often deployed to perform police duty with serious implications for professionalism in the military, not to mention the effects of its exposure on civil–military relations.
Meanwhile, the increasing loss of confidence in the ability of the police to secure the civil populace is worsened by the public conduct of many of its personnel. Last year, the Police Service Commission (PSC), the body responsible for the regulation of the police service, announced that it was investigating some state command police commissioners for alleged complicity in crime. Nobody knows what has become of that investigation. But since the processes leading to the recruitment of personnel into many of the security services in our country have been compromised, it is also no surprise that many social misfits are legally carrying arms to terrorise Nigerians.
Indeed, that the strident calls for the establishment of state police have now been endorsed by the Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) is an expression of concerns and indeed a vote of no confidence in the present structure and management of the Nigeria Police Force. However, as we have canvassed on this page several times, whatever may be the merit in such idea, it is not a silver bullet given that the same subversion that has rendered the federal police ineffectual could easily be replicated in the states. But we agree that the current situation where our policemen have become an easy game for a more sophisticated world of crime calls for a radical solution.
Thisday